Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ivan Iriarte's avatar

I'll be the first to post a comment. I believe all three of the Off-Guardian "explanations" are plausible, and not mutually exclusive. My only hope is that, as you suggest, sheep develop just enough of a "shrew nose" that they don't fall for the same BS again. I cannot believe there are still people who cannot see it. As I have mentioned before, you do not need to believe in any "conspiracy theories" (even if they may be true), nor figure out if viruses exist or not. It is just that common sense should tell us that we cannot live requiring people to wear masks, restricting movement and human contact, doing ridiculous tests to go to places, or forcing people to get "vaccinated". As I have mentioned before, I find it even more absurd to see medical doctors - who should know that all of this is BS - getting into the "pandemic" bandwagon.

Expand full comment
SheilaB's avatar

Great post, Todd. I, like you, am surrounded closely by sheep. Although exasperated by them, I am not unsympathetic to them, as a former sheep-shrew myself, twice jabbed and never again - with anything. A former shrewp, perhaps? I like to have more shrew than sheep in there, as I fully 'transitioned' after only two presentations by actual scientists on the 'good side', whom I had the misfortune to come across slightly too late, given my age and early position in the vaxx schedule.

Like a reformed smoker who can't shut up about the harms of ciggies, having been full shrew for 2 years now, I am annoyingly obsessed with everything on the shrew agenda (I had to detox from the climate agenda too). Annoyingly to my sheep-family, that is, and to the friends and 'friends' who are not happy with me, that I have tried (mostly unsuccessfully) to wake up.

My doctor husband is not at all shrewish. It has taken me 20 years to discover that he is compliance personified, which was the opposite of my impression for all those years. I know he knows by now that I'm right about the Agenda, but he won't come out and say it, although he does occasionally come out with a general 'we're doomed', trying to keep a veneer of humour/sarcasm because he can't face the truth in its unadulterated awfulness. I don't think he'll take another jab (he collapsed a week after his first and only booster and ended up being followed up by a cardiologist for several months), unless his actual food supply is cut off if he refuses. That's probably a while away yet (a year? 18 months?), when digital ID is brought in, with vaxx status incorporated (and CBDCs).

Like Mike Yeadon, my intention is to refuse digital ID and injections, even if my food supply is cut off, but none of us knows how courageous we will be until we are genuinely tested. We don't know if they will use our children and grandchildren to try to force us. I have had some internal conversations with myself about that too.

I feel sorry for the students. But they need to refuse. It's unlikely, given our overlords' timeline, that they will get much or possibly any reward for their intellectual labours. The plan is for fewer jobs, UBI, digital currency, and, very likely, the forgiveness of debts (mortgages and student loans) in exchange for an undertaking to never own private property. Most of them don't know this, of course, because it's a 'conspiracy theory'.

Expand full comment
94 more comments...

No posts