Although there never was enormous debate amongst the world’s great religions as to whether or not God created the material world, there certainly has been debate amongst the men and women of science as to whether God existed at all. Still, many of the great scientists of the time of the Enlightenment were men of God (and yes, most, were men). Galileo, Copernicus, and Isaac Newton were deists, although their views about a supreme power in the Universe may not have been precisely aligned with the Church’s, they certainly would be considered believers by today’s standards. And these are only three mentioned here out of many.
At some point, the church backed off a bit regarding its scrutiny over the “study of nature” and allowed scientists to make their discoveries without fear of being burned at the stake. In fact, it is often stated that after the Enlightenment, the Catholic Church was one of the largest financial contributors to scientific inquiry in the world. However, for quite some time, it was still expected that scientists “believed” and walked within a narrow band of tolerance. Certainly the belief that God was behind anything that scientists discovered about nature was a given.
Slowly but surely the Church lost whatever power it had earlier regarding its authority over how the universe that God had created was perceived. Scientists continued to pick over the working parts of nature, coming up with a perception of the universe that contained fewer and fewer reasons to require a supreme creator (although in my humble opinion, most of these conclusions came out of pure arrogance). God the mechanic, meaning God the creator of the physical world, became less and less a certainty to science. The world of non-scientists followed suit while science tried its darndest to replace all religions with its own special form of dogma.
Once people started realizing that they could get away with being bad and Dad would not necessarily find out and punish them, they drifted further and further from a belief in a supreme being. Along with this disillusionment of God as the great invisible arbiter, science continuously told them that the material aspect of creation was all explainable and easily defined. God was a delusion. The world, believing that progress meant a greater reliance on science for explanation, followed suit. God died, and as Nietzsche so eloquently pointed out, we killed him.
Needless to say, not every single human being on Earth went along for Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride. Many did not. And I am not convinced it is just a coincidence that the parts of the world that stuck with God did not advance as quickly technologically as the parts that dumped him. Of course, the major dump occurred just recently—probably only within the past 75 to 100 years. Maybe even more recently than that. Surely the greatest technological advancements have been made within the past few decades, and maybe the greatest of all within the last few years. Along with those advancements have come the greatest departure from an awareness of God ever seen in the history of the world. I have no hard data on this, so don’t quote me. This observation is empirical and mostly is derived from recent events. I think most of you reading this may agree.
I have never seen until now the focus on transhumanism and transhuman technology, technocracy, an assault on religion and spirituality, and a general disregard for humanity and human dignity. Nor have I ever seen such an emphasis on advancing technology with no consideration at all for how it affects the human spirit—nuclear weaponry, AI, robotics, medical advancements, GMO, 5G, Chemtrails, vaccine genocide, genetic experimentation, to name only a few.
And of course, in the words of the late great Kurt Vonnegut, and so it goes.
But can we just let it “go”? I don’t think so . . . Just when it seemed like it was safe to go back into the viral water (which of course is an illusion), this comes along: Self Spreading Vaccines, which are, believe it or not, even more frightening than Gates’ “flying syringe mosquitoes.”
On a recent Highwire “Jaxen Report,” it was revealed that this technology has been around for quite a while and is reaching the point of no return. It was not quite ready to implement during the Covid incident, but it will certainly be ready the next time around—when the agenda decides to release the next “deadly pandemic.”
It is beyond the scope of this tiny article to explain what this potentially evil technology actually is, but I will share a few highlights here. It is best to go look at the Highwire presentation, and then, if interested, look further into the technology from various sources.[1]
Here is a quote from attorney (for ICAN) Aaron Siri, Esq.
“With this product, the whole idea is they release it to basically one person, and it spreads to every single person on the globe. So, if they mess it up one time, just once, just once,” he emphasized, “they can mess up the entire world.”
“What might even be the biggest victim ... if they ever release this thing, it’s going to be civil, individual rights . . . Here, they’re going to release a product where you’re going to have no choice effectively but to take it. That is the ultimate crushing of individual and civil rights.”
They (the developers of all of this) claim their biggest stumbling block is informed consent, obviously a pesky formality. Here is a quote from Timothy Notton, author (with others) of the journal article The Case for Transmissible Antivirals to Control Population-Wide Infectious Disease.
Infectious disease control faces significant challenges including: how to therapeutically target the highest-risk populations, circumvent behavioral barriers, and overcome pathogen persistence and resistance mechanisms.
All this involves a very clever way of inserting a shortened “parasite” DNA strand into a human cell that of course then replicates (as most vaccine technology is dependent). The difference here is that the strand can mutate and spread in the same manner a virus spreads (if you believe viruses even are a thing). The most chilling aspect of this new genetic technology is that once you let the cat out of the bag, you can’t put it back in. Like Pandora’s box. the demons are released forever and spread from human to human like wildfire, and no one can say yea or nay regarding the genetic alteration in their own body. It is self-spreading—and continuously mutating into God knows what (no pun intended). This whole thing is a lot more complicated than what I lay out here, of course. If interested, do your research.
Even if you have not ventured deep enough into the rabbit hole to believe it is the agenda’s intention to lessen the global population, you should be able to see how this new technology could be a disaster. If you do believe the agenda’s goal is democide, then you can see how they have hit the jackpot with this one. The Brothers Extraordinaire Weinberger & Weinberger may be so captivated with their cleverness that they don’t have a clue what they have created with its nefarious implications. Their handlers certainly know what they’ve got, even if the creators are just useful idiots to him.
The possibility of things going wrong here even a ten-year-old would be concerned with. It is quite massive. First, it is self-mutating, just like a virus is. Thus, it can essentially turn into anything over time. It is a shortened strand, so it is easier for it to enter a cell and does not have to compete with the virus it is designed to combat. I could go on and on, but I don’t have the space. Read, listen, research, this thing where you can, and see for yourself. The Myopic Microscope Eye is at work again. And of course, playing God is also at work again. Since most of these tech-freaks have no understanding of what divine position means, they believe the sky’s the limit and since all this technology is “dumb” with no creative mind of its own, they think they have complete control over it. “Oh my, quit your metaphysical mumbo jumbo, it is perfectly safe.”
To make matters worse, Big Brother (DARPA) is involved with all of this as well, and actually owns part of the patent given the technology.
What does this have to do with “God the Mechanic?” Well, atheist types may be a bit more lenient when judging God-believing types because they have, since the Enlightenment, believed that God is in charge of the “unseen” world, and science is in charge of the “seen” world. In other words, why concern yourself with an invisible God that oversees an invisible world, which in a materialist science paradigm, does not even exist? It then is a moot point. Therefore, again, they feel that in the material world, they can manipulate all that they want with zero unknown (and potentially dangerous) consequences, or at least no consequences they believe they do not have complete control over. And keep in mind, even God’s mechanics follow rules. The world He created was meant to run efficiently without much human intervention.
The Highwire episode ends with a scene from the Spielberg film Jurassic Park, and it is worth ending this article with the same set of quotes, as it is near perfectly right on target. It consists of a conversation between the overly confident and rather arrogant scientists who have just mastered the cloning of DNA to create all female dinosaurs (so they supposedly have control over their procreation) and the Jeff Blum character, Dr. Ian Malcomb, a mathematician who specializes in Chaos Theory.
Dr. Ian Malcolm: But again, how do you know they're all female? Does somebody go out into the park and pull up the dinosaurs' skirts?
Henry Wu: We control their chromosomes. It's really not that difficult. All vertebrate embryos are inherently female anyway, they just require an extra hormone given at the right developmental stage to make them male. We simply deny them that.
Dr. Ellie Sattler: Deny them that?
Dr. Ian Malcolm: John, the kind of control you're attempting simply is… it's not possible. If there is one thing the history of evolution has taught us it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free, it expands to new territories and crashes through barriers, painfully, maybe even dangerously, but, uh… well, there it is.
John Hammond: [sardonically] There it is.
Henry Wu: You're implying that a group composed entirely of female animals will… breed?
Dr. Ian Malcolm: No. I'm, I'm simply saying that life, uh… finds a way.
God, the mechanic, saw to that for sure. Life is creative, it has spirit and soul, with the capacity to create something out of nothing, which science clearly does not give it credit for.
[1] Be sure to check out the “inventors” of this technology Leor and Ariel Weinberger as well as Leor’s “TedMed” talk where, being so enthralled and impressed with his own God-like cleverness, he breaks down and cries.
I would like to underline that I am speaking personally when I say what I am about to say, being fully aware that one cannot go from the particular to the general. I grew up in Roman Catholic Ireland in the forties and fifties, when the bible and all its stories were taught as fact, with no room for questions regarding interpretation. For me at age six (communion class), this belief came to an end, upon being taught that all non-Roman Catholics went to Hell; my background is Quaker and Presbyterian and I had many good upstanding beloved relatives of these persuasions, so I instinctively knew this to be false and said so (with dire consequences!!!). The result was that, as an adult, I did throw religion out the window, while retaining a sense of awe about the World and Nature. The problem was that I equated God with religion for many years, until I realised I could just substitute the word Divine for God. Science has many limitations, amongst them being only able to explain the seen; humans constitute a tangible body and an intangible soul/spirit, both part of one whole.
I wish these so-called inventors would stop trying to play God. Ultimately, they may succeed in destroying us and life as we know it. Sadly, many people today do not believe in a higher power. They actually think they are the creators.