here, unfortunately german version (must be in english somewhere too) of the important conversation Tucker and Bobby, explaining how it came to that Donny co-a-lit-I-on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy-yLQk0-uE
Also most recent talk by Dr. Jack Kruse explaining more the RFK family history:
Good points Todd and nice to see policy comparisons of all; three, I agree anyone who wants to end carnage should get one's vote. Ukraine they may want to end, but will anyone of them really back away from supporting Israel and their carnage in Gaza which this country enables. I'm not so sure on that one. Linking as usual @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
The Palestine/Israel problem is still a problem. I thought it was a very glaring omission in RFK's speech...not a word about Israel...maybe that was because although the US supports Israel I don't think the US has sent billions in military aid to assist Israel's attack on Gaza...although who knows.
HATE is the operative word here. I can see any sane person not agreeing with all of his policies...or how is goes about implementing them. You don't have to have psychological issues to disagree with him. But to HATE him...and really to HATE anyone or anything, usually carries with it a psychological "issue"...
Hating a concept, ideology or idea is not the same, as usually that sort of "hate" just becomes a word that is easy to use. If a person does hate an ideology, with an over-the-top passion, then you may be dealing with a similar psychological projection.
I do not like Biden, or Harris, or Fauci, or any of these players. But I do not personally hate them. People who do not like Trump typically HATE him...with a viciousness and passion that does not make much sense. If his policies directly affected them, let's say he deports a family member who ends up dead, and then he is "hated" for that...there is at least some direct behaviour to hate...he is then a murderer to that person.
But Trump has had little direct effect to that magnitude with his policies on anyone. Grabbing pussies may make many women feel threatened by his power as president to treat women poorly, but he has not actually done that no matter what he has said that would be deemed "misogynist"...and even if he did, it is unlikely it would affect an individual to a degree that they would rationally HATE him for it.
Does that make sense? Trump hate (as well as Biden/Harris hate) to the degree I am talking about is not due to rational thinking, it is a psychological pathology...
Men typically enjoy women groping them, the ones that do not, I doubt if women bother to grope.
There is an archetypal difference that is seldom noted. It works both ways though, a decent man, who is a mature male, does not grope women who do not want to be groped. Certainly, the punishment for immature groping may be out of balance with the crime...
Trump; the unpolished populist ... says whatever comes to mind without consequence because he's been able to do so for 70+ years. Born into great wealth, he has parlayed $400M into a few billion. Nobody seemed to have a problem with this non-politician when he was just a real estate developer or television personality. But now, he is one of the most despised men (and, at the same time, one of the most beloved) on the planet. I can't help wonder if corporate state run media and a weaponized justice system has had anything to do with that. You say you can't stand listening to him? Ok, I haven't been able to stand listening to any politician since Reagan. Bush? Clinton? Obama? Biden? ... to me they've all been cringe-worthy in their own way ... not to mention purposely deceitful and self-serving ... two character flaws I can't seem to label Trump with. As for me, I'm voting for the candidate who is least totalitarian ... for what matters to me above all else is freedom & liberty for all.
"Elite" in this context just means "higher on the social scale"...which typically (but not exclusively) means more money, more possessions, more power, more free time...not really the salt of the earth. It doesn't mean "better than" or even "special"...
An excellent article……I could care less about surface personality….I will add to that hair , teeth , number of smiles per minute yada yada . Unfortunately this is the basis for decision making on the part of most folks. . The exit from the Ukraine would be a deal breaker for me if I was casting a vote . This is the war that everyone wanted but was afraid to ask for . The US and UK clearly prodded the bear here . Added to the deaths are the billions of dollars funnelled thru the military industrial complex re this mission ……it is truly evil. Again “ why “ can’t folks see this .
I appreciate the listing of each candidate’s policies. I am a supporter of Kennedy and very sad that his campaign has been limited because of the Democratic Party’s actions. Although I am not a fan of Trump, Kennedy now has a much larger platform to voice his concerns and possible plans for the future.
Yes, I know. He will also be better set up for 2028 since Trump can’t run again. In order to implement most of his ideas he needs to have some political power. Hopefully Trump follows through and keeps his word.
I am wondering what prompts you to label Putin as an obvious "bully". He is a masterful politician and diplomat and the most rational, not to mention intelligent head of state I am aware of. Also, he waited eight years for NATO to change course, giving them ample opportunity to prevent the Russian intervention in Ukraine, (which is not the same as waging war). Of course NATO went ahead with their plans regardless - what do they care about the 700,000 lives lost, the more the merrier for those bloodthirsty Satanists! - and decided to also offer membership to Sweden and Finland for good measure. So if we are looking for bullies, I would gaze in the direction of Europe (I am from western Europe, so I am not speaking up because of patriotism).
I pretty much agree with everything you say here. But I would still call Putin a bully. I cannot condone aggressive militarism under any circumstances (except for defence). We could certainly call this “defence” considering the position the West took regarding their own aggression with NATO…and the little country of Ukraine unfortunately became the battlefield.
I could change my mind about Putin’s “bully” title. I certainly see the positive sides to him. I visited Moscow for the first time in 1996, and the last time in 2006. Although I have not been back since most of the positive reform, I know it is there. Putin turned that country around for sure, as it was clearly headed into the toilet when I first visited. If it took some “bully” attitude to do that, then so be it.
I think Trump is a bully too…not of the same calibre, but he is tough and will do what he thinks is necessary. Carry a big stick, as they say. I think in this complex world, where a lot of leaders are certifiably insane, you have to be tough. That is one reason why Trump supports a strong military.
Yes, I think it took someone quite extraordinary to turn the ship around after the fall of the Soviet Union, especially considering the role (and greed and corruption) of the oligarchs and the entrenched, entitled political class. Someone able to firmly stand his ground, and capable to adapt where and when necessary. I don't think a bully can come up with this kind of finesse, and I don't see Trump having it, for instance.
Though I have to say that the usual labels applied to Trump - narcissist, bully etc. - don't satisfy me either. How could a narcissist stand being attacked more brutally by the press, other politicians and half of the US plus most of the rest of the world than probably anyone has ever been, except for Putin, and campaign for more? A billionaire to boot, who could play golf and enjoy his golden years instead. That doesn't make sense to me. And even if he appears crude and WWF-like, he can also be quite polished and well-spoken and -mannered when he wants.
Bullies bully because they are fearful. I don't sense fear in either Putin or Trump. The usual stereotypes don't apply to either of them, in my opinion. Maybe they are just better at hiding their psychopathy? I don't know.
That said, an "Illuminati" insider shared years ago that the Russian president was very high up in their hierarchy. That he knew him well and personally liked him a lot, though he didn't approve of his role in the Agenda and where it would lead the world.
I think the world theatre is so multi-layered and -facetted that most of us can't grasp it. The media portray what they want us to see. The real game is played behind the curtains and we aren't privy to it.
I didn’t mention this in the article, but if I decide to vote, and RFK is not on my ballot, I will VOTE for Trump. I think all of his bad points are actually what this country needs (I say “this” country because I was born American). It needs good points too, kindness, agreeableness, etc. But to kill a rat you have to have sharp teeth.
My motto: actions speak louder than words... I am always saying, look at Presidents/politicians policies, together with whether they follow through. However, people get caught up in personalities, e.g., Obama is charismatic, therefore, a good guy; Trump is an obnoxious misogynist, therefore, a bad guy.
Exactly. Unfortunately we can’t assess actions before they are elected. And yes, people get caught up in personalities. And character flaws such as “misogyny” is difficult to assign because the word is dependent on an objective definition, and for words like misogyny, rasicst, sexist, or even “obnoxious” and “asshole” are subjective.
Thanks so much for putting this all together in a clear and organized way. I really appreciate the time you put into this and all your posts. I’m sharing it far and wide!
here, unfortunately german version (must be in english somewhere too) of the important conversation Tucker and Bobby, explaining how it came to that Donny co-a-lit-I-on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy-yLQk0-uE
Also most recent talk by Dr. Jack Kruse explaining more the RFK family history:
https://www.brokentruth.tv/p/watch-1960s-weaponized-cancer-research
or directly on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcbuqQd57rY
Just in case one didn't know the name of Dr. Fauci No1, and what the war on cancer was about ..;)
Good points Todd and nice to see policy comparisons of all; three, I agree anyone who wants to end carnage should get one's vote. Ukraine they may want to end, but will anyone of them really back away from supporting Israel and their carnage in Gaza which this country enables. I'm not so sure on that one. Linking as usual @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
The Palestine/Israel problem is still a problem. I thought it was a very glaring omission in RFK's speech...not a word about Israel...maybe that was because although the US supports Israel I don't think the US has sent billions in military aid to assist Israel's attack on Gaza...although who knows.
Still...that has to end as well.
Thank you for the link!!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KxpGHVwwnog
This was excellent, thank you...and it fits my article perfectly!!
Why elites hate Trump
HATE is the operative word here. I can see any sane person not agreeing with all of his policies...or how is goes about implementing them. You don't have to have psychological issues to disagree with him. But to HATE him...and really to HATE anyone or anything, usually carries with it a psychological "issue"...
Hating a concept, ideology or idea is not the same, as usually that sort of "hate" just becomes a word that is easy to use. If a person does hate an ideology, with an over-the-top passion, then you may be dealing with a similar psychological projection.
I do not like Biden, or Harris, or Fauci, or any of these players. But I do not personally hate them. People who do not like Trump typically HATE him...with a viciousness and passion that does not make much sense. If his policies directly affected them, let's say he deports a family member who ends up dead, and then he is "hated" for that...there is at least some direct behaviour to hate...he is then a murderer to that person.
But Trump has had little direct effect to that magnitude with his policies on anyone. Grabbing pussies may make many women feel threatened by his power as president to treat women poorly, but he has not actually done that no matter what he has said that would be deemed "misogynist"...and even if he did, it is unlikely it would affect an individual to a degree that they would rationally HATE him for it.
Does that make sense? Trump hate (as well as Biden/Harris hate) to the degree I am talking about is not due to rational thinking, it is a psychological pathology...
I know more women who have groped men than men who have groped women. We gals have always been able to get away with a lot more. 😉
Men typically enjoy women groping them, the ones that do not, I doubt if women bother to grope.
There is an archetypal difference that is seldom noted. It works both ways though, a decent man, who is a mature male, does not grope women who do not want to be groped. Certainly, the punishment for immature groping may be out of balance with the crime...
Trump; the unpolished populist ... says whatever comes to mind without consequence because he's been able to do so for 70+ years. Born into great wealth, he has parlayed $400M into a few billion. Nobody seemed to have a problem with this non-politician when he was just a real estate developer or television personality. But now, he is one of the most despised men (and, at the same time, one of the most beloved) on the planet. I can't help wonder if corporate state run media and a weaponized justice system has had anything to do with that. You say you can't stand listening to him? Ok, I haven't been able to stand listening to any politician since Reagan. Bush? Clinton? Obama? Biden? ... to me they've all been cringe-worthy in their own way ... not to mention purposely deceitful and self-serving ... two character flaws I can't seem to label Trump with. As for me, I'm voting for the candidate who is least totalitarian ... for what matters to me above all else is freedom & liberty for all.
Yes, I agree...and I too cannot listen to any of these weasels. It almost made me gag to listen to Biden's State of the Union speech...
Why Trump drives the elite crazy by Jordan Peterson
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KxpGHVwwnog
Who Jordan calls 'elite,' I call degenerate and despotic.
"Elite" in this context just means "higher on the social scale"...which typically (but not exclusively) means more money, more possessions, more power, more free time...not really the salt of the earth. It doesn't mean "better than" or even "special"...
But it is a title I doubt they mind being labeled with ... and so it galls me to do so. ;)
True...how about "lying pigs"??
An excellent article……I could care less about surface personality….I will add to that hair , teeth , number of smiles per minute yada yada . Unfortunately this is the basis for decision making on the part of most folks. . The exit from the Ukraine would be a deal breaker for me if I was casting a vote . This is the war that everyone wanted but was afraid to ask for . The US and UK clearly prodded the bear here . Added to the deaths are the billions of dollars funnelled thru the military industrial complex re this mission ……it is truly evil. Again “ why “ can’t folks see this .
When you say "exit from the Ukraine" being a "deal breaker" do you mean you WANT an exit? Or you DON'T want an exit?
Want an exit !
I appreciate the listing of each candidate’s policies. I am a supporter of Kennedy and very sad that his campaign has been limited because of the Democratic Party’s actions. Although I am not a fan of Trump, Kennedy now has a much larger platform to voice his concerns and possible plans for the future.
I voted for Trump in both elections and I will vote for him again, but I cannot listen to him speak.
So funny. That sounds like me.
Strange bedfellows, indeed. He’s looking for a cabinet post
Yes, I know. He will also be better set up for 2028 since Trump can’t run again. In order to implement most of his ideas he needs to have some political power. Hopefully Trump follows through and keeps his word.
I am wondering what prompts you to label Putin as an obvious "bully". He is a masterful politician and diplomat and the most rational, not to mention intelligent head of state I am aware of. Also, he waited eight years for NATO to change course, giving them ample opportunity to prevent the Russian intervention in Ukraine, (which is not the same as waging war). Of course NATO went ahead with their plans regardless - what do they care about the 700,000 lives lost, the more the merrier for those bloodthirsty Satanists! - and decided to also offer membership to Sweden and Finland for good measure. So if we are looking for bullies, I would gaze in the direction of Europe (I am from western Europe, so I am not speaking up because of patriotism).
I pretty much agree with everything you say here. But I would still call Putin a bully. I cannot condone aggressive militarism under any circumstances (except for defence). We could certainly call this “defence” considering the position the West took regarding their own aggression with NATO…and the little country of Ukraine unfortunately became the battlefield.
I could change my mind about Putin’s “bully” title. I certainly see the positive sides to him. I visited Moscow for the first time in 1996, and the last time in 2006. Although I have not been back since most of the positive reform, I know it is there. Putin turned that country around for sure, as it was clearly headed into the toilet when I first visited. If it took some “bully” attitude to do that, then so be it.
I think Trump is a bully too…not of the same calibre, but he is tough and will do what he thinks is necessary. Carry a big stick, as they say. I think in this complex world, where a lot of leaders are certifiably insane, you have to be tough. That is one reason why Trump supports a strong military.
Yes, I think it took someone quite extraordinary to turn the ship around after the fall of the Soviet Union, especially considering the role (and greed and corruption) of the oligarchs and the entrenched, entitled political class. Someone able to firmly stand his ground, and capable to adapt where and when necessary. I don't think a bully can come up with this kind of finesse, and I don't see Trump having it, for instance.
Though I have to say that the usual labels applied to Trump - narcissist, bully etc. - don't satisfy me either. How could a narcissist stand being attacked more brutally by the press, other politicians and half of the US plus most of the rest of the world than probably anyone has ever been, except for Putin, and campaign for more? A billionaire to boot, who could play golf and enjoy his golden years instead. That doesn't make sense to me. And even if he appears crude and WWF-like, he can also be quite polished and well-spoken and -mannered when he wants.
Bullies bully because they are fearful. I don't sense fear in either Putin or Trump. The usual stereotypes don't apply to either of them, in my opinion. Maybe they are just better at hiding their psychopathy? I don't know.
That said, an "Illuminati" insider shared years ago that the Russian president was very high up in their hierarchy. That he knew him well and personally liked him a lot, though he didn't approve of his role in the Agenda and where it would lead the world.
I think the world theatre is so multi-layered and -facetted that most of us can't grasp it. The media portray what they want us to see. The real game is played behind the curtains and we aren't privy to it.
AGREED: "I have to admit I am not a Trump fan."
I didn’t mention this in the article, but if I decide to vote, and RFK is not on my ballot, I will VOTE for Trump. I think all of his bad points are actually what this country needs (I say “this” country because I was born American). It needs good points too, kindness, agreeableness, etc. But to kill a rat you have to have sharp teeth.
My motto: actions speak louder than words... I am always saying, look at Presidents/politicians policies, together with whether they follow through. However, people get caught up in personalities, e.g., Obama is charismatic, therefore, a good guy; Trump is an obnoxious misogynist, therefore, a bad guy.
Exactly. Unfortunately we can’t assess actions before they are elected. And yes, people get caught up in personalities. And character flaws such as “misogyny” is difficult to assign because the word is dependent on an objective definition, and for words like misogyny, rasicst, sexist, or even “obnoxious” and “asshole” are subjective.
... yes, I should pay attention to the words I use!!!... and will say that I stand by them, but add that is how both Obama and Trump seem to me...
Thanks so much for putting this all together in a clear and organized way. I really appreciate the time you put into this and all your posts. I’m sharing it far and wide!
I agree… thank you Todd!!!!
Thank you! Means a lot…