Ever since Stew Peter’s sensational documentary, “Died Suddenly”, hit the internet there has been a lot of focus, once again, on the dangers of the vaccines. Of science fiction and horror film proportions, the documentary led us through potential vaccine horrors by graphically displaying countless stringy, grotesque, blood clot-like, substances literally being pulled from the bodies of the deceased. What could be more evidential of the ill effects of the Covid 19 vaccines?
Put two and two together and you’ve got what seems to be a clear indication that anyone having taken the killer vaccination will soon die and, if not the actual cause of death, will certainly develop these almost alien like forms in their blood vessels. Talk about Invasion of the Body Snatchers! What could be more obvious? Or is it as obvious as it seems?
Well, it is rather indisputable that something quite horrific is happening. I think it has pretty much been proven these things are indeed unique, and never seen before. (Dr. Ryan Cole, a board certified anatomic and clinical pathologist, was extensively interviewed on “The Highwire” by Del Bigtree. His testimony is priceless, and very important, make sure you check it out. See link below.)
What is still not evidentially clear:
Does everyone vaxxed suffer such consequences?
Is this phenomenon only occurring in the vaxxed? Or is it also present in people who have suffered from the affliction popularly known as “Covid.”
Does the vax contain other killers, such as graphene oxide, parasites, nano particles that can build structures within the body?
Is the vaccine a conscious effort to kill a large portion of the population? Or is it just a error-filled money grab subject to the errors of rushed and minimal testing, messy production, and a myriad of other “mistakes?”
Does the vaccine cause other problems, and can we prove they do, such as cancer, sterilization, still borns, mental issues, dementia, etc.?
Start a discussion here with these questions as a starter, and add your own. What should we be concerned about and what is mere speculation or conjecture?
If I may, I'd also like to ask what other think about the movement that in essence claims that virology got it completely wrong and that viruses are not pathogenic particles, but exosomes - debris from disintegrating cells. The result of diseases, as opposed to the cause. This notion is promoted by people like Stefan Lanka, Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, and many others. They mostly use reasoning to disprove the virology methodology, as opposed to actual research, even though Lanka has done some experiments (they say that funding is not available for research liable to disprove the viral theory).
Now, allopathic medicine is clearly full of holes and suffers from 1,000+1 problems, and what the abovementioned say makes good sense (even though what virologists say makes good sense too and I don't have the biological knowledge to determine whether one holds more water than the other), but are these efforts legit? Or is it another cul-de-sac issue, something tossed to people to forever mull over, to distract them?
"Is the vaccine a conscious effort to kill a large portion of the population? "
During the past two years, I've been forced to investigate stuff I never would have, and I've heard claims that seem preposterous in view of the conventional knowledge. Viruses don't exist in the sense of being pathogenic particles. The germ theory is fallacious. Contagion does not take place. Plus, man's never been on the Moon and a whole bunch of other things.
I remember reading the novel Nonstop by Brian Aldiss when I was a kid. An interesting story depicting how the perception of reality can be completely distorted. Is our reality twisted, the original sense of purpose lost, are humans on a trajectory far from what it somehow meant to be? Or are people grossly manipulated, is what constitutes the basis of our knowledge corrupted, are we intentionally indoctrinated with rubbish that's meant to keep us in a cage implanted in our psyches - kinda as per George Carlin's "smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork"? That probably applies without question. Anyway, anything goes as far as I'm concerned, including an effort by a group of would-be elitists to kill a large portion of the population. Just because something appears outrageously absurd, it doesn't mean that it can't be happening. Likewise, just because something didn't happen in the past, it doesn't mean that it can't happen in the future. Deriving knowledge about the future from the past is very limited.
The question I ask is why would "they" want to kill off a large portion of the population. One reason could be the forthcoming scarcity of energy. What spins the wheels of today's world is the availability of cheap energy - coal, crude oil, natural gas. That's what has driven the technological advances in the past few centuries, the rise in living standard, the luxury we have (the Occident also benefits greatly from exploiting the rest of the world, but that's a different issue).
It could be that sources of cheap energy are running out, and if they're not, they sooner or later will be. And even if the supply of energy is renewable, as per, for example, the abiotic theory, there is a threshold beyond which more energy will be extracted than replenished, resulting in an eventual economic collapse. Be that as it may, the economic model based on continuing growth and continuing need for energy is not sustainable. At some point, there simply won't be enough energy to cover the production of goods, food, etc. There are only two solutions to that - reducing consumption and reducing population size. Interesting thoughts on this subject are here - https://ourfiniteworld.com/author/gailtheactuary/
Now, huge efforts are taking place to reduce production and consumption. Is the other factor in the equation - population reduction - also in the plan? Is it taking place? Suppose that humankind really were faced with a situation where reducing the population, rather quickly, would be the only solution to an economic predicament liable to destroy humankind one way or another, such as due to famine, war, total implosion of institutions? Regardless of whether such a threat were real or only perceived by a bunch of psychopathic "elitists"? Would this be how "they'd" go about solving it? Would they kill people indiscriminately? That doesn't make sense - some people are more valuable than others in terms of being able to "run the machines and do the paperwork". Who would they want to get rid of? Probably Westerners - they're the most bothersome from their viewpoint. They're used to relative freedom, luxury, self-governance. Much less obedient than for instance the Chinese. But the Chinese are jabbed as much as people in the West, if not more. It doesn't make sense.
On the other hand, why did, or do, they want to inject everybody?
Anyway, I think Stew Peters is a shill. The guy is not genuine. It could be that they made one half of the population scared of the virus and the other of the vaccine. Everybody is scared of something, preoccupied, and they can go ahead with their technocratic revolution. And where the virus/vaccine is yesterday's news, which is pretty much the case where I live, they've got the war, nukes, and Putler.
It's probably unquestionable that the shots are having adverse effects, but they appear to be the same kind of psy-op as the virus.
I assume you’ve seen the Bill Gates interview with Stephen Colbert where Gates refers to part of his plan as “the final solution”. Colbert jokingly corrects him and they both have a good guffaw along with the audience(or laugh track). History will hopefully recognize the evil inherent in this exchange. Hopefully history is just around the corner.
Some comments related to your questions. They are not based on any “hard data” or evidence. Just my opinions, based on (maybe) common sense, my observations, and some past medical experience:
1 – We don’t expect everyone to respond the same way to any intervention. There is a lot of variability and idiosyncrasies. Some people will have a full hypotensive (low blood pressure) response with just a single pill of blood pressure medication; others will take maximum doses of the same medication and continue with high blood pressure. I believe the “vaccine” will kill some, harm others, and cause no problems in still others.
2- So far, it seems like only the “vaccinated” are getting these serious adverse effects. During 2020, before the “vaccines”, we did not see any of the problems we are seeing with the “vaccinated” in individuals who had covid.
3 – Anything is possible, but unfortunately, I believe that many of the people who are promoting these other theories have issues with credibility. Also, it is difficult for me to explain some of the things that are claimed. For example, it is hard for me to explain how spoons will magnetically attach to your body, from the amount of graphene that could be diluted in 0.5 cc of “vaccine”, especially if distributed throughout the body.
4 – We have discussed this in another article. I there is a “cabal” trying to kill the population, they seem to be killing the wrong people (the sheep, and those living in “developed” - less populated – countries). I may be wrong.
5 – I think the answer is yes. As I have mentioned elsewhere, in the past I used to know maybe 1-3 persons every year with a new diagnosis of cancer. This last year I know dozens. Also I have seen too many (a lot more than in the past) people with herpes, elevated liver enzymes, abnormal uterine bleeding… all “coincidentally” after the “vaccine”.
A large part of the Ryan Cole interview (the big reveal) is that no graphene could be found in any of the samples he sent to over 100 scientists overseas.
As for the Died Suddenly film: IMHO it's an obvious clowning operation. The film starts with images of BigFoot, etc that are sure to send sheep running for the hills. Cui bono? Certainly not shrews who are trying to wake up sheep. My theory is that the subject of horrendous blood clots is such a colossal threat to the establishment that Stew Peters (who himself has caused serious damage to the covid shrew community by taking pot shots at Malone), has helped to sabotage the entire clot narrative. We don't need any more straw men. My money's on Malone and Cole.
Dec 13, 2022·edited Dec 13, 2022Liked by Todd Hayen, PhD, RP
I just watched "The Big Reset" (recommended by SheilaB). This is a MUST-SEE documentary. Btw, I also watched "Died Suddenly" and in my opinion, this one is much, much better.
Dec 13, 2022·edited Dec 13, 2022Liked by Todd Hayen, PhD, RP
Generally it seems the categories of side effects are blood clotting, neurological issues, inflammatory issues (inflammation of the heart and other parts of the body), and immune system dysregulation & autoimmunity. I think it's going to be so hard, probably impossible, to parse out what is what without a larger percentage of the population focused on it. These problems are still newly arising in the people around me, including my family. Quite a few sick, one possible pulmonary emboli, one possible blood clot in the foot, vertigo, worsening rheumatoid arthritis to the point where a friend needs to move away to warmer ground, and severe anxiety.
Since there's so much uncertainty around the covid vaccine injection and covid policies, my efforts are developing a happy and healthy community. This necessitates psychological, emotional and physical health.
Everyone needs to find a community in their area, and my primary concern is for the unvaccinted people who don't have a solid community in their area. These communities of course can include vaccinated people, but there are still significant psychological barriers to many vaccinated people recognizing vaccine side effects. With only 12% of Americans taking the bivalent booster, there may be more than I know outside of my liberal Bay area California. I have the unjabbed people I will be in the trenches with, and I have vaccinated immediate family, including two stepsons and their families, that did not reject me for being pure blood.
Thanks for the high wire link, I will watch that now. Dr Cole did a great interview on American Thought Leaders and a little earlier on Dr Drew. He's giving these great broad interviews that are perfect for newbies. He's great; he's always so professional and calm in these interviews.
1. Clearly, most vaxxed people aren't seeing the worst consequences, even 2 years on. That doesn't mean they won't in the coming years - it will be years before we really know and the authorities will do their best to make it even harder to share information. (They will doubtless get brutal, with psychiatric (or terrorist) diagnoses for the 'hesitant' and dissident.) Just from anecdotal evidence from family/friends, I know that people are suffering from random things like fatigue (including extreme chronic fatigue), brain fog, a variety of infections (some of them very serious), memory problems, tinnitus, which it would never occur to them to link to the vaxxes. Despite having taken two jabs early on, before anything much was known about adverse events, I'm pretty much fine (jabs in Feb and May 21) but I take nothing for granted. Nor do I engage in wishful thinking. I found out what is going on too late for me, but in time to warn my daughters. Despite not totally disbelieving what I told them, they went ahead and took the jabs anyway, for their own reasons. I was devastated and worry all the time for them, especially as I can't see either of them holding out against the extreme pressure that will doubtless come in the future (with CBDCs/social credit and whatnot). As for my grandson, his future is my nightmare.
2. It would seem that those getting covid but not getting early treatment are the ones who suffer from long covid (as well as the serious short-term risks and death). Graphene molecules have been found in the unvaxxed, though, which is nothing to do with covid and more likely to be due to shedding and/or said molecules being introduced into people in other ways, e.g via food, water and spraying.
3. Growing evidence suggests self-assembling graphene oxide nano-particles are definitely in there (and are turning up also in the unvaxxed). I don't know about parasites. I have heard it said that the nanotech (possibly nano-transmitters and -receivers) doesn't stay functioning forever AND that it can be disabled with Chlorine Dioxide (this from Todd Callender, but there is a PDF on Dr Lee Merritt's Substack [Medical Rebel?] on how to prepare it). It seems to have other benefits too. The fact that they endlessly push boosters suggests to me that it's not 'one and done' in terms of killing people, but that's speculation, as is so much.
4. Absolutely deliberate. The only thing that isn't clear is how many people who are links in the chain perhaps don't know what they've been part of. That includes an unknown percentage of doctors and nurses.
5. Yes, there is evidence of all these harms.
I've seen Died Suddenly. I agree that Stew Peters' approach would put some people off - I would never recommend the film to a 'newbie'. I think the Spanish film 'The Big Reset' (English narrative version) is way better. Thanks for the link to Dr Cole's interview.
The biggest "tell" that the authorities had no idea what they were doing throughout this entire Covid response and vaccination mess has been their refusal/unwillingness to address or debate any of the many learned, often renowned, doctors and scientists who identified concerns about pandemic management, from vaccines to masks to lockdowns and more. That was enough for me to know I wanted to stay as far away from these con-artists and autocrats as I could. After all, they had all of the resources of taxpayer money to hire the best experts around to debunk what they insisted was disinformation but instead they just persisted in the fear mongering and Police State bullying. All of my life I have avoided anyone, and refused to be dictated by, anyone who told me I had no right to question their demands. I have remained unvaccinated and it is becoming more and more apparent every day that I made the right decision. It has cost me in terms of travel, relationships (close and casual), general well being, but I have not regretted my decision for one minute. Thank you to all who have provided the "science" that helped me understand better what I needed to know to make the right decision.
The issue is the extent to which any and all deaths deemed "sudden" become death by injection. It begins to sound like all those crazy "COVID" death counts.
I do think experimental treatments given to hundreds of millions or several billion people with no known ingredients and preconditions of the subjects would more than likely lead to countless deaths and long term health harm.
Beyond that if the intent is to drive fear away from this experiment, there's that benefit, but until we can do pathological postmortems samplings and examinations to more accurately determine living effects, our only real sense comes from detailed analysis of the all-cause-mortality comparisons, timelines by age.
Given what we do know these are harmful injections and should have been stopped within the first month of the campaign. Not to have done so reinforces the notion that this a psychological operation with no interest in health.
The only thing that granted it possible legitimate anchor in my mind was the presence of Looney, whom I consider 'sincere' by his prolonged persistence and determination. But, who knows?
I think the whole point of this panoptic psyop is to create a condition of complete uncertainty as to what is true and what is false, no matter how irrational and absurd, to the extent that under other circumstances no one would even consider reasonable to contemplate, to completely confuse and cloud the public mind into atomized, paranoid,, omni-mistrustful, psychotic hyper-vigilant, withdrawn, amnesiacal impotence, while the controlled demolition of the economy and it's globally reorganized, authoritarian management structure and readminstration is gradually implemented and replaces what existed before Friday, March 13, MMXX.
And, no, I won't spread enemy propaganda, it does it well and fast enough itself.
Take the womb factory parody that appeared on YouTube a day ago, that I then saw, and this morning heard a South African radio show host discussing in a live conversation interview with a guy from Toronto, before 24hrs elapsed from it's posting.
I think possibly all of the above but also add ( irrespective of the vax ) the hopelessness
( depression?) felt by many ….much more on this re substance abuse not following up on med issues etc ……..meaning to raise the mental affects of the suppression worse than the vax itself
Thanks, Todd, for kicking off the topic and discussion, I have my doubts about the doc, seems to me there's an element of voyeuristic carnival peep show necrophilia involved, as a 'sequel' to snake venom.
By now some of you are doubtless aware of the day old news report of the "sequel" to the pandemic simulation ""Event 201" by the same people who preceded the pandemic declaration and ongoing psyoperation.
I am not going to repeat it, it's out there, you are SURE AS THE SUNRISES to hear of it if you haven't, within hours.
What it tells me is this
I don't think Gates is a clairvoyant visionary, I think he's a snake oil salesmen and false prophet, who specializes in engineering and superimposing self-fulfilling prophecy, resulting in the imposition of enslavement by slight-of-tongue, perceived as voluntary choice implemented for the benefit of humanity he is a multi billionaire charlatan with moobs playing table-top generalissimo and declaring his sadistic, misanthropic intentions right before everyone's eyes as clearly as Mister Hister wrote Mine Kampf.
Dec 12, 2022·edited Dec 12, 2022Liked by Todd Hayen, PhD, RP
Good questions. I can answer #4. If it were actually an error, we'd be seeing msm attempts to explain, justify, and government and medical establish attempts to rectify. We are seeing none of this, so no chance it is "just" an error.
Another Good Read about surprises!
MUST NOT READ: Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5.pdf
If I may, I'd also like to ask what other think about the movement that in essence claims that virology got it completely wrong and that viruses are not pathogenic particles, but exosomes - debris from disintegrating cells. The result of diseases, as opposed to the cause. This notion is promoted by people like Stefan Lanka, Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, and many others. They mostly use reasoning to disprove the virology methodology, as opposed to actual research, even though Lanka has done some experiments (they say that funding is not available for research liable to disprove the viral theory).
Now, allopathic medicine is clearly full of holes and suffers from 1,000+1 problems, and what the abovementioned say makes good sense (even though what virologists say makes good sense too and I don't have the biological knowledge to determine whether one holds more water than the other), but are these efforts legit? Or is it another cul-de-sac issue, something tossed to people to forever mull over, to distract them?
What are your thoughts?
"Is the vaccine a conscious effort to kill a large portion of the population? "
During the past two years, I've been forced to investigate stuff I never would have, and I've heard claims that seem preposterous in view of the conventional knowledge. Viruses don't exist in the sense of being pathogenic particles. The germ theory is fallacious. Contagion does not take place. Plus, man's never been on the Moon and a whole bunch of other things.
I remember reading the novel Nonstop by Brian Aldiss when I was a kid. An interesting story depicting how the perception of reality can be completely distorted. Is our reality twisted, the original sense of purpose lost, are humans on a trajectory far from what it somehow meant to be? Or are people grossly manipulated, is what constitutes the basis of our knowledge corrupted, are we intentionally indoctrinated with rubbish that's meant to keep us in a cage implanted in our psyches - kinda as per George Carlin's "smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork"? That probably applies without question. Anyway, anything goes as far as I'm concerned, including an effort by a group of would-be elitists to kill a large portion of the population. Just because something appears outrageously absurd, it doesn't mean that it can't be happening. Likewise, just because something didn't happen in the past, it doesn't mean that it can't happen in the future. Deriving knowledge about the future from the past is very limited.
The question I ask is why would "they" want to kill off a large portion of the population. One reason could be the forthcoming scarcity of energy. What spins the wheels of today's world is the availability of cheap energy - coal, crude oil, natural gas. That's what has driven the technological advances in the past few centuries, the rise in living standard, the luxury we have (the Occident also benefits greatly from exploiting the rest of the world, but that's a different issue).
It could be that sources of cheap energy are running out, and if they're not, they sooner or later will be. And even if the supply of energy is renewable, as per, for example, the abiotic theory, there is a threshold beyond which more energy will be extracted than replenished, resulting in an eventual economic collapse. Be that as it may, the economic model based on continuing growth and continuing need for energy is not sustainable. At some point, there simply won't be enough energy to cover the production of goods, food, etc. There are only two solutions to that - reducing consumption and reducing population size. Interesting thoughts on this subject are here - https://ourfiniteworld.com/author/gailtheactuary/
Now, huge efforts are taking place to reduce production and consumption. Is the other factor in the equation - population reduction - also in the plan? Is it taking place? Suppose that humankind really were faced with a situation where reducing the population, rather quickly, would be the only solution to an economic predicament liable to destroy humankind one way or another, such as due to famine, war, total implosion of institutions? Regardless of whether such a threat were real or only perceived by a bunch of psychopathic "elitists"? Would this be how "they'd" go about solving it? Would they kill people indiscriminately? That doesn't make sense - some people are more valuable than others in terms of being able to "run the machines and do the paperwork". Who would they want to get rid of? Probably Westerners - they're the most bothersome from their viewpoint. They're used to relative freedom, luxury, self-governance. Much less obedient than for instance the Chinese. But the Chinese are jabbed as much as people in the West, if not more. It doesn't make sense.
On the other hand, why did, or do, they want to inject everybody?
Anyway, I think Stew Peters is a shill. The guy is not genuine. It could be that they made one half of the population scared of the virus and the other of the vaccine. Everybody is scared of something, preoccupied, and they can go ahead with their technocratic revolution. And where the virus/vaccine is yesterday's news, which is pretty much the case where I live, they've got the war, nukes, and Putler.
It's probably unquestionable that the shots are having adverse effects, but they appear to be the same kind of psy-op as the virus.
My two cents.
I assume you’ve seen the Bill Gates interview with Stephen Colbert where Gates refers to part of his plan as “the final solution”. Colbert jokingly corrects him and they both have a good guffaw along with the audience(or laugh track). History will hopefully recognize the evil inherent in this exchange. Hopefully history is just around the corner.
Some comments related to your questions. They are not based on any “hard data” or evidence. Just my opinions, based on (maybe) common sense, my observations, and some past medical experience:
1 – We don’t expect everyone to respond the same way to any intervention. There is a lot of variability and idiosyncrasies. Some people will have a full hypotensive (low blood pressure) response with just a single pill of blood pressure medication; others will take maximum doses of the same medication and continue with high blood pressure. I believe the “vaccine” will kill some, harm others, and cause no problems in still others.
2- So far, it seems like only the “vaccinated” are getting these serious adverse effects. During 2020, before the “vaccines”, we did not see any of the problems we are seeing with the “vaccinated” in individuals who had covid.
3 – Anything is possible, but unfortunately, I believe that many of the people who are promoting these other theories have issues with credibility. Also, it is difficult for me to explain some of the things that are claimed. For example, it is hard for me to explain how spoons will magnetically attach to your body, from the amount of graphene that could be diluted in 0.5 cc of “vaccine”, especially if distributed throughout the body.
4 – We have discussed this in another article. I there is a “cabal” trying to kill the population, they seem to be killing the wrong people (the sheep, and those living in “developed” - less populated – countries). I may be wrong.
5 – I think the answer is yes. As I have mentioned elsewhere, in the past I used to know maybe 1-3 persons every year with a new diagnosis of cancer. This last year I know dozens. Also I have seen too many (a lot more than in the past) people with herpes, elevated liver enzymes, abnormal uterine bleeding… all “coincidentally” after the “vaccine”.
A large part of the Ryan Cole interview (the big reveal) is that no graphene could be found in any of the samples he sent to over 100 scientists overseas.
As for the Died Suddenly film: IMHO it's an obvious clowning operation. The film starts with images of BigFoot, etc that are sure to send sheep running for the hills. Cui bono? Certainly not shrews who are trying to wake up sheep. My theory is that the subject of horrendous blood clots is such a colossal threat to the establishment that Stew Peters (who himself has caused serious damage to the covid shrew community by taking pot shots at Malone), has helped to sabotage the entire clot narrative. We don't need any more straw men. My money's on Malone and Cole.
I just watched "The Big Reset" (recommended by SheilaB). This is a MUST-SEE documentary. Btw, I also watched "Died Suddenly" and in my opinion, this one is much, much better.
https://odysee.com/@thebigreset:1/ENGLISH:bb
Generally it seems the categories of side effects are blood clotting, neurological issues, inflammatory issues (inflammation of the heart and other parts of the body), and immune system dysregulation & autoimmunity. I think it's going to be so hard, probably impossible, to parse out what is what without a larger percentage of the population focused on it. These problems are still newly arising in the people around me, including my family. Quite a few sick, one possible pulmonary emboli, one possible blood clot in the foot, vertigo, worsening rheumatoid arthritis to the point where a friend needs to move away to warmer ground, and severe anxiety.
Since there's so much uncertainty around the covid vaccine injection and covid policies, my efforts are developing a happy and healthy community. This necessitates psychological, emotional and physical health.
Everyone needs to find a community in their area, and my primary concern is for the unvaccinted people who don't have a solid community in their area. These communities of course can include vaccinated people, but there are still significant psychological barriers to many vaccinated people recognizing vaccine side effects. With only 12% of Americans taking the bivalent booster, there may be more than I know outside of my liberal Bay area California. I have the unjabbed people I will be in the trenches with, and I have vaccinated immediate family, including two stepsons and their families, that did not reject me for being pure blood.
Thanks for the high wire link, I will watch that now. Dr Cole did a great interview on American Thought Leaders and a little earlier on Dr Drew. He's giving these great broad interviews that are perfect for newbies. He's great; he's always so professional and calm in these interviews.
1. Clearly, most vaxxed people aren't seeing the worst consequences, even 2 years on. That doesn't mean they won't in the coming years - it will be years before we really know and the authorities will do their best to make it even harder to share information. (They will doubtless get brutal, with psychiatric (or terrorist) diagnoses for the 'hesitant' and dissident.) Just from anecdotal evidence from family/friends, I know that people are suffering from random things like fatigue (including extreme chronic fatigue), brain fog, a variety of infections (some of them very serious), memory problems, tinnitus, which it would never occur to them to link to the vaxxes. Despite having taken two jabs early on, before anything much was known about adverse events, I'm pretty much fine (jabs in Feb and May 21) but I take nothing for granted. Nor do I engage in wishful thinking. I found out what is going on too late for me, but in time to warn my daughters. Despite not totally disbelieving what I told them, they went ahead and took the jabs anyway, for their own reasons. I was devastated and worry all the time for them, especially as I can't see either of them holding out against the extreme pressure that will doubtless come in the future (with CBDCs/social credit and whatnot). As for my grandson, his future is my nightmare.
2. It would seem that those getting covid but not getting early treatment are the ones who suffer from long covid (as well as the serious short-term risks and death). Graphene molecules have been found in the unvaxxed, though, which is nothing to do with covid and more likely to be due to shedding and/or said molecules being introduced into people in other ways, e.g via food, water and spraying.
3. Growing evidence suggests self-assembling graphene oxide nano-particles are definitely in there (and are turning up also in the unvaxxed). I don't know about parasites. I have heard it said that the nanotech (possibly nano-transmitters and -receivers) doesn't stay functioning forever AND that it can be disabled with Chlorine Dioxide (this from Todd Callender, but there is a PDF on Dr Lee Merritt's Substack [Medical Rebel?] on how to prepare it). It seems to have other benefits too. The fact that they endlessly push boosters suggests to me that it's not 'one and done' in terms of killing people, but that's speculation, as is so much.
4. Absolutely deliberate. The only thing that isn't clear is how many people who are links in the chain perhaps don't know what they've been part of. That includes an unknown percentage of doctors and nurses.
5. Yes, there is evidence of all these harms.
I've seen Died Suddenly. I agree that Stew Peters' approach would put some people off - I would never recommend the film to a 'newbie'. I think the Spanish film 'The Big Reset' (English narrative version) is way better. Thanks for the link to Dr Cole's interview.
Sorry this is a bit long!
The biggest "tell" that the authorities had no idea what they were doing throughout this entire Covid response and vaccination mess has been their refusal/unwillingness to address or debate any of the many learned, often renowned, doctors and scientists who identified concerns about pandemic management, from vaccines to masks to lockdowns and more. That was enough for me to know I wanted to stay as far away from these con-artists and autocrats as I could. After all, they had all of the resources of taxpayer money to hire the best experts around to debunk what they insisted was disinformation but instead they just persisted in the fear mongering and Police State bullying. All of my life I have avoided anyone, and refused to be dictated by, anyone who told me I had no right to question their demands. I have remained unvaccinated and it is becoming more and more apparent every day that I made the right decision. It has cost me in terms of travel, relationships (close and casual), general well being, but I have not regretted my decision for one minute. Thank you to all who have provided the "science" that helped me understand better what I needed to know to make the right decision.
Personally I'm no fan of Stew Peters. I think his sensationalism takes away credibility.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jessica5b3/p/this-is-absolutely-unacceptable?r=8ztdu&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web This video from a vaxx injured woman should be on the news.
The issue is the extent to which any and all deaths deemed "sudden" become death by injection. It begins to sound like all those crazy "COVID" death counts.
I do think experimental treatments given to hundreds of millions or several billion people with no known ingredients and preconditions of the subjects would more than likely lead to countless deaths and long term health harm.
Beyond that if the intent is to drive fear away from this experiment, there's that benefit, but until we can do pathological postmortems samplings and examinations to more accurately determine living effects, our only real sense comes from detailed analysis of the all-cause-mortality comparisons, timelines by age.
Given what we do know these are harmful injections and should have been stopped within the first month of the campaign. Not to have done so reinforces the notion that this a psychological operation with no interest in health.
The only thing that granted it possible legitimate anchor in my mind was the presence of Looney, whom I consider 'sincere' by his prolonged persistence and determination. But, who knows?
I think the whole point of this panoptic psyop is to create a condition of complete uncertainty as to what is true and what is false, no matter how irrational and absurd, to the extent that under other circumstances no one would even consider reasonable to contemplate, to completely confuse and cloud the public mind into atomized, paranoid,, omni-mistrustful, psychotic hyper-vigilant, withdrawn, amnesiacal impotence, while the controlled demolition of the economy and it's globally reorganized, authoritarian management structure and readminstration is gradually implemented and replaces what existed before Friday, March 13, MMXX.
Thanks for your appreciation.
It's a heads up, to me.
Keep a close eye.
And, no, I won't spread enemy propaganda, it does it well and fast enough itself.
Take the womb factory parody that appeared on YouTube a day ago, that I then saw, and this morning heard a South African radio show host discussing in a live conversation interview with a guy from Toronto, before 24hrs elapsed from it's posting.
I think possibly all of the above but also add ( irrespective of the vax ) the hopelessness
( depression?) felt by many ….much more on this re substance abuse not following up on med issues etc ……..meaning to raise the mental affects of the suppression worse than the vax itself
Thanks, Todd, for kicking off the topic and discussion, I have my doubts about the doc, seems to me there's an element of voyeuristic carnival peep show necrophilia involved, as a 'sequel' to snake venom.
Thanks also, since I argue enough with myself!
By now some of you are doubtless aware of the day old news report of the "sequel" to the pandemic simulation ""Event 201" by the same people who preceded the pandemic declaration and ongoing psyoperation.
I am not going to repeat it, it's out there, you are SURE AS THE SUNRISES to hear of it if you haven't, within hours.
What it tells me is this
I don't think Gates is a clairvoyant visionary, I think he's a snake oil salesmen and false prophet, who specializes in engineering and superimposing self-fulfilling prophecy, resulting in the imposition of enslavement by slight-of-tongue, perceived as voluntary choice implemented for the benefit of humanity he is a multi billionaire charlatan with moobs playing table-top generalissimo and declaring his sadistic, misanthropic intentions right before everyone's eyes as clearly as Mister Hister wrote Mine Kampf.
Good questions. I can answer #4. If it were actually an error, we'd be seeing msm attempts to explain, justify, and government and medical establish attempts to rectify. We are seeing none of this, so no chance it is "just" an error.