Shrew Views

Shrew Views

Share this post

Shrew Views
Shrew Views
When “Good for You” is Too Good
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

When “Good for You” is Too Good

Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP
Dec 29, 2023
∙ Paid
22

Share this post

Shrew Views
Shrew Views
When “Good for You” is Too Good
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
16
1
Share

The ultimate “good for you” is to be dead. At least that is what it would be if some outside authority, or entity, was watching our human behaviour and assessing what looks to be the “best” for us—meaning that if we are dead, nothing bad can happen to us. I would assume that if we fed all of the information a typical human life creates into a supercomputer, and then asked it “what is the best state of being for a human being” it would spit out, “that it never be born, and if alive, it would be safest, (best, good,) for it to be dead.”

The next notch down from this perfection would be to live in a bubble, literally. Apparently, there are some people who have no immune systems who have to do this (remember the Seinfeld episode, “The Bubble Boy”?)

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Shrew Views to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Todd Hayen, PhD, RP
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More