50 Comments
User's avatar
BubbleMan's avatar

The thing is, we are already living forever ... just not in the human form.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Yes, that is true. But we are having a physical experience, and we would like it to reflect the divine as much as possible.

Expand full comment
Zarayna Pradyer's avatar

Thanks, Todd.

The only trouble transhumanists may have, however clever and progressive they are, is that they have completely under-appreciated and misunderstood what life is.

Sadly, they worship and serve a lesser god.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

The lesser god of physicality and materialism.

Expand full comment
Zarayna Pradyer's avatar

So pathetic! They obviouisly have such little ambition!

Thanks, Todd.

Expand full comment
FortheLoveofFreedom's avatar

This is a very interesting piece Todd! Over the last several decades having 'God' in one's life has greatly diminished. When a person has no spiritual connection, I imagine it to be like a canoe floating out on the ocean - empty and without hope or direction. Your words, "Fear is a vehicle for ultimate control", that is absolute. All one needs to do is listen to the language today - 'weather warning', 'heat warning', 'Trump will end democracy', 'planet Earth can not survive this climate problem unless we stop x,y,z', ' disease this or that', and of course the wars and 'threats' they predict. ALL FEAR driven to capture those who have their heads in their devices or their minds in the clouds (however, if that was true they would notice the chemtrails). Overall, it feels pretty overwhelming.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Fear is definitely a useful tool, and maybe the most prominent one, for the agenda. The human animal has been very successfully primed for fear...no more God, no more belief that we can take care of ourselves, total reliance on physical existence for meaning, I am surprised we are (as a culture) not more fearful than we obviously are. The human race is there for the asking. "Save us, save us!!!" is the ubiquitous cry.

And yes, if we have no faith, we are a floating canoe in the ocean. I did not use to believe that faith in God and the "promise of the soul" was essential for human existence...it was just a given for me, a "no brainer" so I never thought about what it would be like without it. Now that is about all that I think about.

Believing is a joke to most people...a "silly superstition"...and possibly a dangerous obsession and an "anti-scientific" and "irrational" belief that can cause huge trauma in the world...religion certainly has been responsible for big trouble...and that is what people focus on...Islam vs Judaism for one...but this is not a representation or consequence of true faith.

Expand full comment
FortheLoveofFreedom's avatar

Great comment Todd. Fear is everywhere we look and it is designed to trigger our brains and emotions. I had been watching the slow and steady creep of using fear well before covid but now this has been taken to an extreme level.

I come across many people who do not believe in anything other than themselves or the government or some other unworthy system. They don't see any connection of themselves to a spiritual calling. They have no ties to the universe, God, or even to nature. What an empty way to live, in my opinion.

Expand full comment
Betsey's avatar

This is an all out war on humanity,

https://tube.solari.com/videos/100324_financial-rebellion/

This article has the link for the symposium, a complete picture of the plan to enslave humanity. Form close supportive groups in your community, we all need each other to come together to oppose this technocratic enslavement of all humanity. Love one another!!!

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Unfortunately, easier said than done... I live in a small rural town, where everybody appears to have abdicated personal responsibility and critical thinking...

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Thanks for the link...

Expand full comment
Candy's avatar

Indeed. It all fits together, each part feeding on the others

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

The further down the rabbit hole you go to get answers, the more it all makes sense.

Expand full comment
Candy's avatar

Yes

Expand full comment
Tiny Shrew's avatar

Fascinating article Todd.. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Thank you!!

Expand full comment
Gwaihir's avatar

Your observations are right on as always. The people (if you can call them that) behind this insanity are madmen, and their fate will be the same as all the madmen that came before them - death and destruction. Unfortunately, they can do a hell of a lot of damage before their time is up.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Yes, the world as we know it will disappear (well, ANY sort of functioning world will disappear) if they are allowed to continue. It will build back up after a million years or so--and good will once again prevail...but that's a long time.

Expand full comment
GABRIELE's avatar

I always look forward to Monday mornings (and Thursdays) to see what Todd has on his mind. When I opened the email I was horrified at the image staring at me, a cold, rigid, mechanistic, loveless viable depiction of the future of humanity. The tone of the article had the same affect. I could not respond because I could not conjure an antidote. Fortunately, I drive my four year old grandson to school on Mondays, a 35 minute trip which was a good diversion. I always have profound conversations with this child and we sometimes make up silly little songs to pass the time. Today I made up a silly little ditty about how I love my car and my car loves me. While searching for the next line, this beautiful little being stopped me and said, "GaGa, a car can't love you!" Bam! We must stop thinking the brain is a computer and the heart is a pump. They are organs that receive spiritual impulses, good and evil. The antidote? Love. For humanity, for God and all that there is. Love will save us. Amen.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Yes, wonderfully said!! Thank you!!!

Expand full comment
Tiny Shrew's avatar

So beautifully said!

Expand full comment
Janet Powell's avatar

Excellent article, thank you… agree on all three points. I believe too that whatever the global elites plan is, in the long run (not too long I hope! ) the majority of humans will not comply! There are huge changes taking place externally and more importantly internally as people are gradually waking up! 👍

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

The "majority of humans" seem to be complying just fine with no intentions of stopping! I wish I had your optimism!

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Unsure whether a "like" is the right word here but, unfortunately, I agree with you more than with Janet 😪

Expand full comment
The Watchman's avatar

Another very good read, Todd,as was your article on Misinformation yesterday at Off Guardian. Linked that one yesterday, linking this one today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Thank you so much!!!

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

I consider the pharma industry's mantra of "prolonging life" could be more aptly described as "prolonging death". I find little comfort in the thought of either living like a vegetable on medication or being morphed into a transhuman... unlikely at my advanced years😊 I lived in Rome in the 1960's and 70s and, amongst many other things, I learnt to appreciate Marcus Aurelius and love this particular quote: “It is not death that a man should fear, but rather he should fear never beginning to live.” I also find Jung's perspective on aging (our "Afternoon of Life") and death and dying, joyful and uplifting.

About war: I read somewhere that the aim of America is to be constantly "at war", rather than winning wars; which makes sense looking at its history...

I agree with you, Todd that this is a war of good vs evil, but hopefully enough of humanity believe in a Higher Power (be it God, Buddha, Nature, etc. ) and, therefore, good will triumph over evil.

Expand full comment
Tiny Shrew's avatar

Hooray for Good.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

I think good will triumph over evil whether we believe in a higher power or not. I think as long as we believe in an evil power, it will influence us. We come out of the box believing in a higher power, it just gets covered up with our insistence that physical life is the only thing to be concerned with.

Yes, the US wishes to be at war constantly, and there are lots of reasons for that. When you think about it, they all make sense from an evil perspective. Right now in Europe, the purpose of the war is to force regime change in Russia...it has nothing to do with preserving Ukraine's democracy (there is no democracy there to preserve). If Russia were run by a US puppet, we would have a much better handle on controlling her resources. It is all about control. And, of course, it isn't really the US, it is the Global Collective.

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Charles Baudelaire: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist."...

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Yep

Expand full comment
Ivan Iriarte's avatar

Great article, as usual, Todd. Just one question: Can nature create itself?

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Did I imply it could or couldn't in the article? In a word, "no"...I don't think it can "create" itself. It is a self-perpetuating system, meaning it can evolve physically if need be to adapt. But I think divine vitality is always present, and always has an influence both at a macro level and at a micro level.

As for "creating" itself, no, I think there has to be a divine "beginning"...a "first mover" as Aristotle indicated. As science likes to say (although I have never heard a scientist actually say this) "Give us one miracle and we'll explain the rest"...

Expand full comment
Ivan Iriarte's avatar

Exactly... I was just observing the phrase "nature's creation". My logical mind tells me that there has to be a Creator. Nature cannot create itself.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

That was for non-believers!

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

I just read a report on WSJ that over 100,000 citizens are over 100 yrs old.

That is up significantly from a 47,000 over 100 when Hugh Downs on Abc 20/20 news ran it.

If this is true, then there is little to wonder about the fact to take out the elderly with the help of

.GOV/pHARMA stealth to insure illness not remedy, as this number will grow ever larger.

I have no clue about the rest over the global nations over 100 data count. I bet it may be similar.

Super Great Art work illustrations to get the mind and sight senses engaged quite immediately.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Thank you Randall...Yes, cutting back on life expectancy would seem to be a number one priority as if anyone is a useless eater the elderly are...sucking on our health care systems...even the ones we pay for, but especially the national systems like in Canada...can you say "Medical Assistance in Dying"?

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

NOBODY is a useless eater... I appreciate that euthanasia is a thorny subject, but if we accept the notion, "The Gift of Life", together with a belief in the Divine, then I find it difficult to justify the taking of a Life. We need to accept that pain and uncertainty are part of living and I would prefer emphasis be put on assisting people to die well and/or helping people to find meaning in their life, despite its challenges. Jung mentions the importance of having meaning in our lives. I feel that "Medical Assistance in Dying" (MAiD) is taking the easy way out. Furthermore, Canada MAiD guidelines are constantly widening, allowing more categories of people to access it. It should serve as an example to other countries not to go down this road, but instead the UK and Ireland are presently discussing similar legislation. Our secular world has become a monster.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

Agree 100%. Maybe there is a time for conscious euthanasia, I will not comment on that, pain is a horrible thing...but NOT euthanasia run and controlled by the state...no way.

Expand full comment
Freedom Fox's avatar

Imagine, if you will, we lived in a world where there could only be absolutes with respect to abortion and euthanasia. That either/both of them being permitted by the state would always, necessarily become controlled by the state, and those who control the state demonstrably benevolent or malevolent as they may be at any moment in time. Or either/both of them impermissible, strictly prohibited, zero exceptions.

In that hypothetical, one extreme or the other extreme, where we had the omnipotent, singular power to choose - we were 'gods' setting laws for lesser men to live by - what would be preferable in our enlightened understanding of mankind, human nature, power, the nature of power?

If we knew that by even allowing it in the smallest, most confined, rigidly applied with rare exception overseen by a committee of the best ethicists man could assemble, that eventually, over the passage of time those constraints would be abandoned, and would unavoidably become wholesale genocide/democide would we allow our 'compassion' for the few suffering beyond our ability to bear inactive witness to convince us to act to alleviate the suffering of those few, knowingly condemning future man to the atrocities that will surely come? Or would we stand firm, line in the sand, declare that the suffering is God's will that we cannot and mustn't try to override because we care more for the future of humanity meeting with unspeakable horrors of genocide/democide?

One or the other. No middle ground is possible. One side must prevail, the other side must concede, no balance is possible in the natural world - like unstable atomic isotopes that will degrade with time. An immutable law of nature. What say you? Others?

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Wow... up to about four years ago, I was in favour of legalising (not personally) abortion and euthanasia, both with strict criteria. However, for whatever reason, it appears that when the door is opened even a chink, the floodgates are opened to abuse. It's all very sad, watching the world go to pot.

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

It is easy to see legislation as a logical solution for many of these issues. I certainly used to believe that. But now that government has essentially been "captured" and will never be true and pure in intention, I think "making rules to conform with what is right" does not really work.

Unfortunately all we have left is personal realization of what is right and what is wrong...and I don't know if it is reasonable to think we, as a culture, will all be capable to tapping into our innate "knowingness" of what is right and what is wrong. So I don't really have a solution...maybe only to keep working on teaching our children to stay consciously connected with source, and know in their heart what is right and wrong, without having someone to tell them.

I would be curious to know if the laws and punishment against murder, for example, is the primary reason people do not murder one another. Sure, there will always be murderers, but I think most people who murder because they are not in touch with their innate "knowingness" of good and evil will do it even if it is against the law...

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

This is brilliantly put...I really don't know what to say. If there was no interpretation to God's rule, I would say, of course, that is the "rule"...but since there is endless interpretation made by man, there will always be doubt whether there was a steadfast rule to live by.

I'm not even sure if that is what you are getting at here.

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Thank you for wording that so succinctly... and I think the last part is also relevant to abortion... another emotive subject

Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

The controversy over abortion really rests on whether you believe human life begins at some point in the womb. If you don't, then you might believe women have a "right of choice" regarding their body.

If you do believe life begins in the womb, then obviously you believe aborting a child while it is in the womb is murder.

Is it more complicated than that?

Expand full comment
Eleanor's avatar

Absolutely agree with you... also "women's right of choice" has always bugged me, because surely the father should have a say.

My problem WAS that in Ireland, thousands of women were travelling to England for an abortion, so, firstly we were exporting our problem and secondly, it was the prerogative of the rich and we did have homegrown botched abortions. Therefore, even though I was/am strongly opposed to abortion, I was for legalising it, with strict guidelines. I never ever saw the day when we would over 10,000 abortions in 2023...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 8
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Todd Hayen, PhD, RP's avatar

thank you...

Expand full comment